![]() There are also a number of standard bot frameworks available. There are already a number of bots running on Wikipedia and many of these bots publish their source code, which can sometimes be reused with little additional development time. ![]() “What I look forward to is a knowledge marketplace, so that people are incentivized to contribute what they know.” And soon enough, his Everipedia entry might just include that quote.If you decide you need a bot of your own due to the frequency or novelty of your requirements, you don't need to write one from scratch. “I’m more drawn to the philosophical, epistemological benefits,” he says. ![]() Indeed, Sanger agreed to join the company not just because of the financial promise of the blockchain, but because it allows the site to overcome the limitations that caused him to leave Wikipedia little more than a year after its founding. “We’ve tried to focus on getting a lot of female edits, younger editors, and diverse background and ethnicities.” (A 2011 survey found that 90% of “Wikipedians” are indeed male, and 28% are over 40.) “Wikipedia is largely older white men,” Forselius says. To hear Forselius tell it, though, the site isn’t trying to match Big W despite starting with Wikipedia's own resources, Everipedia wants to create an entirely new class of of truth-seekers. Compare that to Wikipedia’s numbers-more than 32 million registered editors for the English-language version, with nearly 140,000 having edited an article in the past 30 days, and upwards of 60 million users a day-and it’s clear that Everipedia has a long way to go to match Wikipedia. Sound cheap? It's completely kosher by the Wikimedia Foundation's own standards.) Yet, Everipedia’s body of human editors, the lifeblood of any wiki-style encyclopedia, isn’t huge while the site boasts 17,000 registered editors, only a “couple of thousand” of those are active, Forselius says. A live bot compares all ongoing changes, updating the posts as they change while giving priority to Everipedia-based edits. (Much in the way Wikipedia was built on a foundation of articles, Everipedia’s founders used Wikipedia’s database as their cornerstone. The assumption is that other users, motivated by the desire to maintain the site’s value, will actively seek to prevent such efforts.īesides, Everipedia is already a functioning encyclopedia it currently sees about 3 million users monthly, and touts itself as having more English-language articles than Wikipedia. If their work is accepted, they get their token back, plus a little bit for their contribution if not, they lose their token. To prevent bad actors from trying to cash in with ill-founded or deliberately false articles and edits, Everipedia will force users to put up a token of their own in order to submit. From then on, creating and curating articles will allow users to earn tokens, which act as virtual shares of the platform. Everipedia already uses a points system where creating articles and approved edits amasses “IQ.” In January, when the site moves over to a blockchain, Everipedia will convert IQ scores to a token-based currency, giving all existing editors an allotment proportionate to their IQ-and giving them a real, financial stake in Everipedia. Blockchain already stands to make medical patient data easier to move and improve food safety now, Everipedia’s founders hope, it will allow for a more powerful, accountable encyclopedia. Oh, blockchain, that decentralized “global ledger” that provides the framework for cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (as well as a thousand explainer videos, and seemingly a thousand startups’ business plans). To do that, Sanger’s new employer is trying something that no other player in the space has done: moving to a blockchain. It describes him as “an American Internet project developer … best known as co-founder of Wikipedia.” By the time you read this, however, it may well mention a new, more salient fact-that Sanger recently became the Chief Information Officer of Everipedia itself, a site that seeks to become a better version of the online encyclopedia than the one he founded back in 2001. At the time of this writing, the opening sentence of Larry Sanger’s Everipedia entry is pretty close to his Wikipedia entry.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |